
and at the date of this report the Board of Directors
comprised of four males all identifying themselves
as Caucasian by ethnic background Diversity of the
Directors is something the Board will be mindful
of in any future recruitment, providing a suitable
candidate possesses the key skills and experience
required for the position
Consumer Duty
The Directors, having noted the requirements in
respect of Consumer Duty, have reviewed the
Investment Manager’s implementation plan, which
was in place by 31 October 2022, and are working
with the Investment Manager to ensure that
implementation of the Consumer Duty requirements
is completed by 31 July 2023, when the new
requirements come into effect
Independence of Directors
The Board regularly reviews the independence of
its members and is satisfied that the Company’s
Directors are independent in character and judgment
and that there are no relationships or circumstances
which could affect their objectivity (with the
exception of Richard Manley who is the CEO of the
Investment Manager)
The 2019 AIC Code recommends that where a
Director has served for more than nine years, the
Board should state its reasons for believing that
the individual remains independent The Board is
of the view that a term of service in excess of nine
years is not in itself prejudicial to a Director’s ability
to carry out his or her duties effectively and from
an independent perspective; the nature of the
Company’s business is such that individual Directors’
experience and continuity of Board membership
can significantly enhance the effectiveness of the
Board as a whole However, the Board has applied
the provision that all Directors are to seek annual
re-election and has determined a policy of tenure
for the Chair and believe that both are essential
in balancing the business of the Company whilst
providing opportunity for regular refreshment and
increasing the diversity of the Board
Directors are appointed with the expectation that
they will serve for a period of at least three years
and all Directors will retire at the first general
meeting after election and will be subject to
annual re-election thereafter in line with practices
recommended in the 2019 AIC Code It is the
Company’s policy of tenure to review individual
appointments every year, with increased scrutiny
after nine years of service to consider whether the
Director is still independent and still fulfils the role
However, in accordance with the principles of the
2019 AIC Code, we do not consider it necessary
to mandatorily replace a Director, including the
Chair, after a predetermined period of tenure A
more flexible approach to Chair tenure will help
the Company manage succession planning in the
context of the business needs of the Company,
whilst at the same time still addressing the need for
regular refreshment and diversity The Company’s
report on Independence, Gender and Diversity is on
page 38
Given that the Chair has now served as a Director for
more than 20 years, the Board and Chair have had a
number of conversations over the last four years with
regard to his ongoing tenure and the process for
identifying his potential successor Whilst the Board
has determined that John Hustler, 76, is capable of
carrying out his duties effectively, given the policies
outlined above, plans are now being made for his
succession In addition, further to Richard Roth’s
announcement that he will retire as an independent
non-executive Director of the Company at the
forthcoming AGM, the Board are also now making
plans to recruit a further new non-executive
Director
In view of the above, the Board is pleased that we
are already in advanced stages in the search for an
independent non-executive Director and expect to
make the appointment within the coming weeks
Remuneration in addition to the Directors’ fees in the
form of a performance incentive fee is potentially
payable to those Directors serving prior to 23 August
2018 subject to certain conditions as set out in
the Directors’ Remuneration Report and Policy on
pages 54 to 57 Having regard for the historic nature
and circumstances under which the performance
incentive fees were agreed, the Board does not
believe that the performance incentive fees in any
way impact or hinder the Directors’ independence
or present a conflict of interest which could
compromise or override independent judgment of
the Directors
Performance Evaluation
In accordance with the 2019 AIC Code, each year
a formal performance evaluation is undertaken
of the Board as a whole, its Committees and the
Directors in the form of one-to-one meetings or
telephone calls between the Chair and each Director
The Directors were made aware of the annual
performance evaluation on their appointment
The Board considers the size of the Company, the
number of independent non-executive Directors
on the Board and the robustness of the reviews
to be such that an external Board evaluation is
unnecessary Annual evaluations of the Board
consider its composition, diversity, succession
planning and how effectively members work
together to achieve objectives as well as individual
contributions The Chair provides a summary of
the findings to the Board, which are discussed at
the next meeting and an action plan agreed The
performance of the Chair is evaluated by the other
Directors The Board has not appointed a Senior
Independent Director, as it does not believe that
such an appointment is necessary when the Board
is comprised solely of non-executive Directors As
suggested in the 2019 AIC Code, the duties of this
role can be, and in this instance are, fulfilled by the
Chair of the Audit Committee, Richard Roth
The Board sets out the assessment of its members
and explains why its members are and continue to be
of importance to the long-term sustainable success
of the business on page 42
Seneca Growth Capital VCT Plc
48
Annual Report & Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December 2022
GOVERNANCE